Rx 590 Vs Gtx 1660 Ti
Cost now 299$ Games supported 97% Price at present 183$ Games supported 94% Comparison of graphics card architecture, marketplace segment, value for money and other general parameters. Value for money To become the index nosotros compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices. Full general performance parameters such equally number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you accept to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards tin can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future figurer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards information technology'due south interface and coach (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no defended VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a dominion, data in this section is precise simply for desktop reference ones (then-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Supported technological solutions. This information will testify useful if you need some particular applied science for your purposes. APIs supported, including item versions of those APIs. Non-gaming benchmark performance comparing. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range. This is our combined criterion performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, only if you notice some perceived inconsistencies, experience free to speak upward in comments department, we usually fix issues speedily. This is probably the most ubiquitous criterion, function of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. Information technology gives the graphics carte a thorough evaluation under diverse load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions nine, ten, 11 and 12 (the final existence done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% 3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics carte du jour with two scenes, 1 depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located inside a sea cavern, the other displaying a space fleet assault on a caught planet. It was discontinued in Apr 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead. Benchmark coverage: 17% 3DMark xi is an obsolete DirectX xi benchmark by Futuremark. It used iv tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite beingness washed in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Fourth dimension Spy. Benchmark coverage: 17% Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 criterion that was used for dwelling PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, information technology has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid. Criterion coverage: 14% Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features 2 carve up tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a peppery animate being seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware. Criterion coverage: 13% Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX eleven feature level 9 to display a battle between 2 infinite fleets about a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Dark Raid. Benchmark coverage: viii% This function of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing 11 tests in various utilise scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for estimator games. Benchmark coverage: i% Allow'due south run across how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Hither are the boilerplate frames per 2nd in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: +0% +0% +32.3% −32.3% −16.2% +sixteen.ii% −3.1% +three.1% +21.ii% −21.2% +115% −115% +28.2% −28.ii% +xi.iv% −11.iv% +9.2% −ix.2% +21.2% −21.two% −82.5% +82.v% +half-dozen.5% −6.5% +twenty.5% −20.5% −eighty% +eighty% +33.iii% −33.3% −32.7% +32.7% +0.9% −0.ix% +ix.9% −nine.9% +72.7% −72.7% +25.3% −25.3% +12% −12% +eight% −8% +21.two% −21.2% −37.5% +37.five% +5.8% −5.8% +15.4% −fifteen.4% +xv.5% −15.v% +31.8% −31.8% −47.5% +47.v% +35.nine% −35.9% −24% +24% +two% −2% +39.4% −39.4% +27% −27% +10.5% −ten.5% +6.6% −half-dozen.6% +21.vi% −21.6% +14.3% −xiv.iii% +1.viii% −1.8% +21.2% −21.2% +8.1% −8.1% +6.5% −half-dozen.v% +12% −12% +54.5% −54.five% +24.2% −24.2% −52.8% +52.viii% +130% −130% −22.2% +22.2% +103% −103% +12.i% −12.1% +133% −133% +threescore% −60% +0% +0% +21.2% −21.ii% +111% −111% +x.5% −10.5% +18.8% −18.8% +8.3% −viii.3% +34.iv% −34.4% +31.half-dozen% −31.6% −121% +121% +7.5% −7.v% −200% +200% +45.8% −45.8% +12.nine% −12.9% +10.nine% −10.9% +208% −208% Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti since it shows amend operation. Should y'all still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, enquire them in Comments department, and we shall reply. Practise yous think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote past clicking "Similar" push button nigh your favorite graphics card. We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 1660 Ti from AMD is Radeon R9 FURY X, which is slower by 14% and lower past 24 positions in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1660 Ti: Nosotros believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon RX 590 from NVIDIA is GeForce GTX 970, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 1 position in our rating. Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon RX 590: We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more than options to consider. Hither you lot can come across the user rating of the graphics cards, too as charge per unit them yourself. Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on a scale of i to 5: Rate AMD Radeon RX 590 on a calibration of 1 to 5: Here you tin can ask a question most this comparing, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPSNVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 590
General info
Place in performance rating 112 147 Value for money 45.20 52.91 Architecture Turing (2018−2021) Polaris (2016−2019) GPU code proper noun Turing TU116 Polaris 30 Market segment Desktop Desktop Release date 22 February 2019 (iii years ago) 15 November 2018 (three years ago) Launch price (MSRP) $279 $279 Electric current price $299 (1.1x MSRP) $183 (0.7x MSRP) Technical specs
Pipelines / CUDA cores 1536 2304 Core clock speed 1500 MHz 1469 MHz Boost clock speed 1770 MHz 1545 MHz Number of transistors 6,600 million 5,700 one thousand thousand Manufacturing procedure technology 12 nm 12 nm Thermal design power (TDP) 120 Watt 175 Watt Texture fill rate 169.9 222.v Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe iii.0 x16 Length 229 mm 241 mm Width 2-slot 2-slot Supplementary power connectors 1x eight-pivot 1x eight-pivot Memory
Memory type GDDR6 GDDR5 Maximum RAM amount vi GB 8 GB Memory bus width 192 Chip 256 Bit Retention clock speed 12000 MHz 8000 MHz Memory bandwidth 288.0 GB/s 256.0 GB/s Shared memory - - Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort HDMI + + Technologies
API back up
DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 (12_0) Shader Model 6.5 6.four OpenGL 4.6 four.6 OpenCL 1.2 2.0 Vulkan 1.ii.131 1.2.131 CUDA 7.v no information Benchmark operation
Overall score
Gaming functioning
Full Hard disk 104 103 1440p lx 60 4K 38 37
Low Preset
Medium Preset
High Preset
Ultra Preset
High Preset
Ultra Preset
High Preset
Ultra Preset
Assassin'southward Creed Odyssey 86 65 Assassin'southward Creed Valhalla 74 86 Battlefield 5 129 133 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120 99 Cyberpunk 2077 71 30−35 Far Cry 5 109 85 Far Cry New Dawn 98 88 Forza Horizon 4 131 120 Hitman iii forty−45 xxx−35 Horizon Aught Dawn 40−45 73 Cherry-red Dead Redemption ii 82 77 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 94 78 Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45 72
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 72 54 Assassinator's Creed Valhalla 55 73 Battleground 5 112 111 Phone call of Duty: Modernistic Warfare 89 81 Cyberpunk 2077 57 thirty−35 Far Cry 5 99 79 Far Cry New Dawn 93 83 Forza Horizon 4 122 113 Hitman 3 twoscore−45 30−35 Horizon Nothing Dawn 40−45 55 Metro Exodus 55 52 Scarlet Dead Redemption 2 45 39 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 82 71 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 116 88 Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45 59
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 53 39 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50 62 Battleground five 102 100 Cyberpunk 2077 46 30−35 Far Weep 5 94 74 Far Cry New Dawn 84 76 Forza Horizon 4 97 91 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62 51 Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45 35
Telephone call of Duty: Modernistic Warfare 57 56 Hitman 3 forty−45 30−35 Horizon Aught Dawn 40−45 37 Metro Exodus 33 31 Red Dead Redemption ii 28 25 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 51 30−35
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 41 30−35 Assassin'due south Creed Valhalla 36 55 Battlefield five 76 30−35 Cyberpunk 2077 27 30−35 Far Cry 5 67 30−35 Far Cry New Dawn 65 58 Forza Horizon 4 77 30−35 Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45 25
Call of Duty: Mod Warfare 31 31 Hitman 3 twoscore−45 thirty−35 Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45 xix Metro Exodus 21 19 Cherry-red Expressionless Redemption 2 nineteen 16 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 26 24 The Witcher three: Wild Hunt 43 32
Assassin'due south Creed Odyssey 25 nineteen Assassin'southward Creed Valhalla nineteen 42 Battlefield 5 43 40 Cyberpunk 2077 11 thirty−35 Far Cry 5 35 24 Far Weep New Dawn 35 31 Forza Horizon 4 51 46 Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45 13 Advantages and disadvantages
Performance rating 39.79 32.56 Novelty 22 Feb 2019 15 November 2018 Memory bus width 192 256 Memory bandwidth 288 256 Pipelines / CUDA cores 1536 2304 Thermal design ability (TDP) 120 Watt 175 Watt
Bandage your vote
Competitors of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti past AMD
Competitors of Radeon RX 590 by NVIDIA
Similar GPU comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-GTX-1660-Ti-vs-Radeon-RX-590
Posted by: baxleydandicared.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Rx 590 Vs Gtx 1660 Ti"
Post a Comment